Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 So. 2d 1090 - Mosby v. State

749 So. 2d 1090 - Mosby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State · 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · McGowan v. State · 632 So. 2d 936 - Brent v. State · Griffin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless there has been a manifest abuse of discretion resulting in injury to the complaining party, we will not reverse the decision. This is because the harm caused is usually speculative and likely inconsiderable and only the trial court was able to observe the demeanor of the witness to determine the harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.