749 So. 2d 1241 - Franks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 279 So. 2d 642 - Shelton v. Kindred · 585 So. 2d 693 - Veal v. State · 555 So. 2d 1009 - Middlebrook v. State · 498 So. 2d 343 - Dye v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“transcripts to assist the jury in understanding taped conversations are permissible where the trial judge instructs the jury that the tape is the primary evidence and any conflicts should fall in favor of the recording.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Denson v. State“The mere fact that portions of a recording are unintelligible does not by itself render the recording inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.