749 So. 2d 300 - Shipp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State · 705 So. 2d 307 - Holland v. State · Johnson v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"This Court has repeatedly held that the granting of a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial judge." The reviewing court recognizes that the trial judge is in the best position to determine whether an objectionable remark has had any prejudicial effect. For this reason, the trial court is allowed considerable discretion in determining whether a remark was so prejudicial that it warrants a mistrial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court has repeatedly held that the granting of a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“natural and probable effect of the prosecuting attorney's improper argument created unjust prejudice against the accused resulting in a decision influenced by prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.