ABC Mfg. Corp. v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
49 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 607 So. 2d 1119 - Smith v. Jackson Const. Co. · 562 So. 2d 1293 - Metal Trims Industries, Inc. v. Stovall · Big" 2" Engine Rebuilders v. Freeman · 727 So. 2d 716 - Ellis v. Anderson Tully Co. · Nash Miami Motors v. Bandel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court uses a de novo standard of review when passing on questions of law including statute of limitations issues.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen the agency has misapprehended a controlling legal principle, no deference is due, and our review is de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he [Cjommission may, at any time prior to one (1) year after the date of the last payment of compensation, whether or not a compensation order has been issued, or at any time prior to one (1) year after the rejection of a claim, review a compensation case, issue a new compensation order which may terminate, continue, reinstate, increase, or decrease such compensation, or award compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. Home Depot
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.