¶1Appellant, Sharon Sinton, challenges an order modifying the visitation provisions of her final judgment of dissolution. Appellant contends she was not given notice that the issue of visitation would be addressed at the hearing on the former husband’s petition to modify the final judgment. Because the court’s pretrial conference order did not list visitation as an issue in dispute, and because both parties filed pretrial statements indicating that the matter of visitation had been settled at mediation, we agree, and reverse. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.200(d); Lentz v. Lentz, 414 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
749 So. 2d 532
Sinton v. Sinton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 29, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-12-29
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2015
2 state decisions
Relies on Lentz v. Lentz
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-12-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →