Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 SO2D 550 - Enchautegui v. State

Enchautegui v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 686 So. 2d 689 - Tory v. State · 547 So. 2d 726 - Manual v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the record demonstrates that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements, the matter must be remanded to the trial court to clarify the sentence imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.