State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Hogan · 669 So. 2d 667 - State v. Black · State v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. In order for a motion to transfer a child to be granted, the burden shall be upon the state to prove all of the following: (1) Probable cause exists that the child meets the requirements of Article 857. (2) By clear and convincing proof, there is no substantial opportunity for the child's rehabilitation through facilities available to the court, based upon the following criteria: (a) The age, maturity, both mental and physical, and sophistication of the child. (b) The nature and seriousness of the alleged offense to the community and whether the protection of the community requires transfer. (c) The child's prior acts of delinquency, if any, and their nature and seriousness. (d) Past efforts at rehabilitation and treatment, if any, and the child's response. (e) Whether the child's behavior might be related to physical or mental problems. (f) Techniques, programs, personnel, and facilities available to the juvenile court which might be competent to deal with the child's particular problems.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.