749 So. 2d 767 - State v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

46 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A. (1) In felony cases, within thirty days following the imposition of sentence or within such longer period as the trial court may set at sentence, the state or the defendant may make or file a motion to reconsider sentence. [[Image here]] B. The motion shall be oral at the time of sentence or shall be in writing thereafter and shall set forth the specific grounds on which the motion is based. [[Image here]] E. Failure to make or file a motion to reconsider sentence or to include a specific ground upon which a motion to reconsider sentence may be based, including a claim of excessiveness, shall preclude the state or the defendant from raising an objection to the sentence or from urging any ground not raised in the motion on appeal or review.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 880 So. 2d 39 - State v. Donaldson · 100 So. 3d 332 - State v. Winston

2. “(1) The defendant may appeal or seek review of a sentence based on any ground asserted in a motion to reconsider sentence. The defendant also may seek review of a sentence which exceeds the maximum sentence authorized by the statute under which the defendant was convicted and any applicable statutory enhancement provisions.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 891 So. 2d 752 - State v. Bertrand · 777 So. 2d 596 - State v. Boudreaux

3. “The police officers had lawful cause to stop Tyler's companion, who was observed drinking from and/or carrying an open glass container in violation of the City's open container ordinance. Nevertheless, mere association with someone whom police lawfully stop is insufficient to furnish a reasonable suspicion that the individual is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 759 So. 2d 918 - State v. Lackings · 784 So. 2d 781 - State v. Robinson