Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 749 SW2D 635 - Adams v. State

Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2014

8 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baltierra v. State · 151 Tex. Crim. 593 - Garcia v. State · Joseph Ferrell v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections · 155 Tex. Crim. 137 - Field v. State · 32 Tex. Crim. 436 - Bell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If the court is notified by a party that the defendant is deaf and will be present at an arraignment, hearing, examining trial, or trial, or that a witness is deaf and will be called at a hearing, examining trial, or trial, the court shall appoint a qualified interpreter to interpret the proceedings in any language that the deaf person can understanding, including but not limited to sign language. On the court’s motion or the motion of a party, the court may order testimony of a deaf witness and the interpretation of that testimony by the interpreter visually, electronically recorded for use in verification of the transcription of the reporter’s notes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “These provisions recognize that the Constitution requires that a defendant sufficiently understand the proceedings against him to be able to assist in his own defense. Clearly, a defendant who has a severe hearing impairment, without an interpreter, cannot understand the testimony of witnesses against him so as to be able to assist in his own defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it is clear that Baltieira, Ferrell, and the Attorney General of Texas have recognized an obligation outside the statute, based on state and federal constitutional law, to fashion a remedy suitable to overcome a particular defendant's disability”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.