¶1Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Sehimmel v Reed, 50 AD2d 1085, affd 40 NY2d 887; Matter of Barton v Lavine, 54 AD2d 350). (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court— CPLR art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan
75 A.D.2d 1023
Urbanski v. Blum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-05-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1987
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-05-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →