¶1Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 31, 1978, setting aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,333.33 and dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the complaint and jury verdict reinstated; the action is remanded with a direction to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $3,333.33, together with costs in all courts. We find that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,333.33 on the second trial of this action, previously held by this court to be an action to recover for unjust enrichment (Saunders v Kline, 55 AD2d 887). Accordingly we have concluded that the Trial Justice erred in setting aside the jury verdict and dismissing the complaint on the alternative grounds of the one-year Statute of Limitations and insufficiency of evidence, and have directed that the complaint and the jury verdict be reinstated and that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiff in accordance therewith. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
75 A.D.2d 531
Saunders v. Kline
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-04-15
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-04-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2015
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →