¶1dissents, on the law, and would reverse and remand. The appellant candidate having presented an explanation for the alterations and changes should not have been found out of hand to have petitions permeated with fraud. The objector should have been required to go forward with some evidence of fraud.
75 A.D.2d 539
Gurley v. Sachs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1980-04-18
Decided 1980-04-18