Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Ariz. 20 - Schuster v. Schuster

Schuster v. Schuster’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2009

18 state decisions

100195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Insurance Company v. Bangs · McMillin v. McMillin · State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist. · Duncan v. Truman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Having determined the court was without jurisdiction, and that the judgment was void from its inception, we find no merit in the contention of appellee that the court is without jurisdiction to proceed in a direct attack upon the judgment such as this is, in the absence of original parties to the action, for the reason that the judgment .being a nullity may be set aside by the court upon the motion of any interested party, or upon its own motion.” Schuster v. Schuster, 75 Ariz. 20, 30 , 251 P.2d 631, 638 (1952).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]he right and duty of an equity court to protect the personal and property rights of an infant is ordinarily limited to those infants within the geographical jurisdiction of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.