Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 Ark. 461

Whitman v. Hitt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1905

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1905-05-27

Allen Hughes, Judge. The judgment rendered by the circuit court of Monroe County, Miss., was not a valid judgment against the appellant, even under the Mississippi Code. Rev. Code, Miss. .(1890), § 3436; 62 Miss. 350; 41 Miss. 102; 1 How. (Miss.), 527. In the absence of a statute permitting suits against a partnership as such, the name of the members of a partnership should be set out in the summons as well as the complaint. 15 Enc.

Reversed · Decided 1905-05-27

Battue, J.

¶1This is an action brought by R. P. Hitt against C. T. Whitman upon a judgment recovered by plaintiff in the circuit court of Monroe. County, in the State of Mississippi, against Whitman-Zook Lumber Company. The plaintiff recovered judgment in this case against Whitman; and he appealed.

¶2In the complaint or declaration in the action in which the judgment sued upon was recovered it was not shown or alleged who the Whitman-Zook Lumber Company is — whether a firm or corporation, and, if a firm, who compose it. In the summons issued in the case the sheriff was directed to summon the Whitman-Zook Lumber Company, and he returned it, saying he had executed it by reading it to C. T. Whitman, of the Whitman-Zook Lumber Company, and delivering him a copy thereof. Whitman answered, and denied that he was indebted to the plaintiff for the sum sued for. • Judgment was rendered against WhitmanZook Lumber Company, but it does not show that the lumber companv was a firm or corporation, and if a firm who composed it. The answer or plea of Whitman was not disposed of. Upon this judgment this action was based. The evidence fails to show that Hitt recovered a judgment in the Mississippi court against Whitman.

¶3Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

/75/ark/461 · .json · Public domain