Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 Ark. 589

Andrews v. Minter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1905

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1905-06-10

John N. Tillman, Judge. Only nominal damages could be recovered. 8 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 557, 593; 3 Suth. Dam. 165, 148. Profits, unless an element of contract, are not recoverable. 53 L. R. A. 97; 48 111. 308; 106 Wis. 78. All exceptions to the testimony were waived. 62 Ark. 254; 70 Ark. 197; 45 Ark. 524; 55 Ark. 376; 70 Ark. 427. The bill of exceptions is insufficient. 38 Ark. 102; 35 Ark. 220; 32 Ark. 529.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1905-06-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1938

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

201905191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Battle, J.

¶1W. L. Minter rented from Lucinda Andrews a certain dwelling house and lot, in Bentonville, Ark., for six months from March 30, 1903, for which he agreed to pay $8.33 1-3 per month. He caused to be hauled and placed on the lot two loads of manure at a cost of $5. This was done with the knowledge and consent of Mrs. Andrews. She sold the house and lot, and refused to deliver him possession. He sued her for damages, and recovered $100.

¶2He testified that the rental value of the house and lot was from $12 to $15 per month. Other witnesses, that it was less. The damage he was entitled to recover was the difference between the price he agreed to pay and the rental value. 3 Sutherland on Damages (3d Ed.), page 2578. He was entitled to recover on account of this difference, according to his own testimony, $22, and $5 for the manure, making $27.

¶3If he will within one week remit $73, his judgment will be affirmed for $27 and 6 per cent, per annum interest from October 3, 1903, the date of his judgment, and costs of the trial court; otherwise, the judgment will be reversed, and "the cause remanded for a new trial.

/75/ark/589 · .json · Public domain