Welborn v. Ruegsegger’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2007
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 548
Relies on Moody v. Amoco Oil Co. · Fiscus v. Beartooth Electric Cooperative, Inc. · Trigg Trigg II v. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management D Andrus E R · Santa Fe Development & Mortgage Corp. v. McCormack (In Re Santa Fe Development & Mortgage Corp.) · Erickson v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I conclude that by the date of the Chapter 12 bankruptcy petition the Debtors held no valid property right or interest in the land and property sold under Contract For Deed of December 14, 1979, and such interest had fully terminated by the agreement of the parties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.