In Re King’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2008
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 722
Relies on Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co · In Re Damron · Pierce v. Industrial Savings Co. (In Re Pierce) · Catholic Credit Union v. Siegler (In Re Siegler)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The value obtainable upon a commercially reasonable sale of necessity contemplates reduction of the gross sales price to reflect costs, including necessary repairs, required to produce the sale. That value, however, does not contemplate the circumstances of an auction or forced distressed sale unless the collateral could not be disposed of in any other manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ridner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.