Gute v. Halstead’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on See v. North American Accident Insurance · Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co. · Hassell v. Bunge · Anderson v. Los Angeles Transfer Co. · Bandle v. Commercial Bank of Los Angeles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court has frequently held that even though all of the facts are admitted or uncontradicted, nevertheless, if it appears that either one of two inferences may fairly and reasonably be deduced' from those facts, there still remains in the case a question of fact to be determined by the jury . . ., and that the verdict of the jury . . . thereon cannot be set aside by this court on the ground that it is not sustained by the evidence.” (See to the same effect Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534, 539-540 [ 110 P.2d 992 ] ; Hamilton v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., 12 Cal.2d 598, 602-603 [ 86 P.2d 829 ]; Tobola v. Wholey, 75 Cal.App.2d 351, 355 [ 170 P.2d 952 ] ; Gute v. Halstead, 75 Cal.App.2d 369, 370 [ 170 P.2d 1016 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.