Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 CALAPP2D 591 - Smith v. Wiget

Smith v. Wiget’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
July 1968
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 1968 · most notably Weeks v. Roberts (1968), Weeks v. Roberts (1968)

36 state decisions

200194619501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior Court · 125 Cal. App. 419 - Steinbauer v. Bondesen · 70 Cal. App. 2d 224 - Breakstone v. Giannini · Meier v. Superior Court · 46 Cal. App. 2d 648 - Elmhurst Packers, Inc. v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And at page 595: “The appellant also contends that upon the hearing of the motion to dismiss he was denied a continuance, and this denial he claims constituted an abuse of discretion. There is no record to show the basis for the claimed continuance and in such circumstances this claim of error cannot be considered. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Every intendment and presumption not inconsistent with the record must be indulged in to support the action of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “These rules apply with particular force where discretion is vested in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.