75 Cal. App. 4th 37 - People v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · People v. Daniels · 44 Cal. 3d 1188 - Evangelatos v. Superior Court · 6 Cal. 4th 1199 - People v. Ochoa · Railroad Commission v. Maxcy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tlo succeed on a facial vagueness challenge to a legislative measure that does not threaten constitutionally protected con- duet ... a party must do more than identify some instances in which the application of the statute may be uncertain or ambiguous; he must demonstrate that 'the law is imper-missibly vague in all of its applications' ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alcalde v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.