Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 COLO 231 - Bogdon v. Fort

Bogdon v. Fort’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
January 1960
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 1960

8 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

9019241930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Holt v. Crucible Steel Company of America · Martin v. Commercial National Bank · Martin v. Commercial Nat Bank of Macon Ga · Schwenke v. Union Depot & R. R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This action is by the assignee of the vendor of five automobile carriages or buss-es which were sold to the Inter-City Automobile Lines of Denver, a corporation, and the object is a foreclosure, as chattel mortgages, of the five written instruments evi dencing the transaction. Whether under the decision in Bailey, Trustee, etc., v. Baker I. M. Co., 239 U.S. 268 , 36 S.Ct. 50 , 60 L.Ed. 275 , under a similar contract, that there is a real distinction between a conditional sale and an absolute sale with a mortgage back, and that the transaction there was strictly a conditional sale, is not important here, even if the conclusion is inconsistent with Andrews & Co. v. Colorado Sav. Bank, 20 Colo. 313 , 36 P. 902 , 46 Am.St.Rep. 291 , which held a somewhat similar contract in legal effect a chattel mortgage. - This is so because the parties here are in accord that under the law of this state the disposition of this case is to be, and should be, as though the instruments in question are chattel mortgages.” '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The weight of authority is that `creditors or third persons' are not general creditors, but, as used in the chattel mortgage act, mean only such creditors or persons as have acquired enforceable liens by execution or writ of attachment, or by contract, during the period of time that the mortgaged property remains in possession of the mortgagor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Every chattel mortgage shall be good and valid between the parties thereto until the indebtedness secured thereby is paid or barred by the statute of limitations.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.