Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Conn. 476 - Bernhard v. Curtis

Bernhard v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1988

2 district · 10 state decisions

50190319101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co. · Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. Patterson · Cohn v. Norton · Snell v. Cottingham · Lewis v. Hartford Dredging Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““such as may fairly and reasonably bo considered either arising naturally; i. o., according to tlie usual course of tilings, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been In the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract as the probable result of the breach of it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.