Central Vt. R. v. Bateman

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1895.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1895-01-29

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.</p>

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1895-01-29

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

¶2Louis Hasbrouck, for plaintiff in error.

¶3Frank E. Smith, for defendant in error.

¶4Before LACOMBE and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6We find no error in the charge of the trial judg(!, and are satisfied that there was such a conflict of testimony upon the issues of fact as to require a submission of the case to the jury. The decision upon *1022defendant’s motion for a new trial because the verdict was, as defendant contended, contrary to the evidence, and for excessive damages, is not reviewable in this court Judgment of circuit court affirmed.