Couper v. Shirley’s Empirical Analysis
75 F. 168 · 1896
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1939
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teal v. Walker · Packet Company v. Keokuk · Allen v. Louisiana · Davis v. Alvord · Hazeltine v. Granger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It may be that some provision, ought to have been made for his pay, but it is clear to our minds that upon the facts presented in this case the party who improperly procured the appointment of the receiver should have been required, if the receiver was entitled to anything, to pay his expenses and services.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Lacov““The sole question for our consideration is whether such a stipulation, of itself, authorized the court to make the appointment, under the laws of Oregon.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.