Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.1d 644 - Pyle v. Clark

Pyle v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

75 F. 644 · 1896

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 1943
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1943

7 federal appellate ·

20189619001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Company v. Houston · Aerkfetz v. Humphreys · Little v. Hackett · Schofield v. Chicago M St P Ry Co · Elliott v. Chicago M St P Ry Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a matter of common experience that passengers in á vehicle trust to the driver to avoid the ordinary dangers of the road, and I do not know of any principle of law which requires them to tender advice, unless conscious of the driver’s ignorance or want of care.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.