Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.2d 1000 - In re Collins

In re Collins’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.2d 1000 · 1935

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 1966
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1966

4 federal appellate ·

701935194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 33

Relies on Lindley v. Shepherd · 36 App. D.C. 435 - In re Mraz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the circumstances of this case, cannot preempt the entire field * * * by broadly teaching that useful results may be obtained by mixtures and combinations of a broad general group of materials without specifically naming such materials * * * or in some other manner pointing out his invention as is required by statute * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`include and claim a specific thing not originally described, merely because it comes within the scope of the genus before disclosed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.