Stone v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
75 F.2d 457 · 1935
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2012
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Walker v. Brown · Trist v. Child · Ketchum v. St. Louis · Wright v. Ellison · Peugh v. Porter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An agreement may be made to create a lien upon property not yet acquired by the party agreeing to give the lien, or not yet in existence. In such case the lien agreed for attaches from the time when the party agreeing to give it acquires an interest in the thing to the extent of such interest.” Oklahoma Stat. 1931, Sec. 10943, 42 O.S. 1951 § 8.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““It was related to and affected real estate because the fund was to come from mineral extracted from the real estate, and it affected that real estate in many respects.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.