Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.2d 549 - Jackson v. Texas Co.

Jackson v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.2d 549 · 1935

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1985
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. · Prowant v. Sealy · Pelham Petroleum Co. v. North · Fox Petroleum Co. v. Booker · James Greenleaf's Lessee v. James Birth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whatever may be the merit or plausibility of the respective arguments of counsel, the fact remains that the correct decision of this case depends upon the discovery and adoption of the true meaning of the deed * * *. The true meaning of the deed can be arrived at only through the consideration of the language used in it, in the light of the situation of the parties under the circumstances existing at the time of the execution of the deed, together with all fair inferences to be drawn from this situation and these circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.