Mains v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
75 F.3d 10 · 1996
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Teague v. Lane · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Sanders v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ Sandstrom ] simply held that an instruction which creates a presumption of fact violates due process if [that presumption] relieves the State of its burden of proving all of the elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. McKune“[ Sandstrom ] does not constitute a `new rule'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. McKune
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.