Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.3d 1225 - Finley U/d/t U/d/t v. Marathon Oil Company

Finley U/d/t U/d/t v. Marathon Oil Company’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.3d 1225 · 1996

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Salgado ex rel. Salgado v. General Motors Corp. (1998), Design Strategy, Inc. v. Davis (2006)

17 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

330199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meinhard v. Salmon · Norman v. Apache Corp. · Amoco Production Co. v. Alexander · 12 Ill. 2d 487 - Carroll v. Caldwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “automatic and mandatory unless the party to be sanctioned can show that its violation of Rule 26(a) was either justified or harmless.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party that without substantial justification fails to disclose information required by Rule 26(a) or 26(e)(1) shall not, unless such failure is harmless, be permitted to use as evidence at a trial, at a hearing, or on a motion any witness or information not so disclosed.. In addition to or in lieu of this sanction, the court, on motion and after affording an opportunity to be heard, may impose other appropriate sanctions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “within 30 days of the [defendant's] disclosure of his expert testimony”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.