Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.3d 1285 - Buck v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Buck v. Federal Deposit Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.3d 1285 · 1996

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1999), Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Local 54 v. Elsinore Shore Associates (1999)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hardin v. Hussmann Corp. · Gibb v. Scott · Office and Professional Employees International Union Local v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he standards for dismissing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) are substantially different” from those applicable to a Rule 56 summary judgment motion; therefore it was inappropriate . for the district court to fail to specify whether it was disposing of an issue according to summary judgment or Rule 12(b)(6) standards). Even where matters outside of the pleadings are presented to the court, however, a motion to dismiss is not converted into a motion for summary judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'under the statutory scheme of the deposit insurance laws, neither the [Federal Home Loan Bank Board] nor the [Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation], which are exercising strictly governmental authority in ordering the closing, are to be considered as employers'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the district court had to treat the [defendant’s] motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment and apply the relevant standards for summary judgment,” and further noting that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.