Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.3d 1366 - United States v. Bauer

United States v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.3d 1366 · 1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 3127 (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7611 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Turner v. Safley · Hernandez v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question whether , a single conspiracy, rather than, multiple conspiracies, has been proved is a question of sufficiency of the evidence. ■ A single conspiracy can include subgroups or subagreements and the evidence does not have to exclude every hypothesis other than that of a single conspiracy. A single conspiracy exists, as compared with multiple conspiracies, where there is one overall agreement to perform various functions to achieve the objectives of the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Government may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person— (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.