Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.3d 207 - Ganther v. Ingle

Ganther v. Ingle’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.3d 207 · 1996

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (2004), Adkins v. Kaspar (2004)

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Cruz v. Beto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the court must determine whether the plaintiff has alleged a violation of a clearly established constitutional right. If the plaintiff fails this step, the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. If she is successful, the issue becomes the objective legal reasonableness of the defendant’s conduct under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “party is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right, even where the defendant is technically in default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.