Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F.3d 357 - Heuton v. Anderson

Heuton v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

75 F.3d 357 · 1996

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably Osborn v. Haley (2007), Aversa v. United States (1996)

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno · Westfall v. Erwin · Kimbro v. Velten · Brown · Melo v. Hafer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the Attorney General may file a certification under [the Westfall Act] whenever he or she concludes that an employee defendant was acting within the scope of his or her employment at the relevant time or times,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “nothing in the Westfall Act gives the district court the authority to refuse to substitute the United States on the ground that either the government or the employee denies the offensive conduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hether an employee was acting within the scope of his employment is a question of law, not fact, made in accordance with the law of the state where the conduct occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.