Akeyo v. O'Hanlon’s Empirical Analysis
75 F.3d 370 · 1996
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2017
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Sandin v. Conner · Olim v. Wakinekona · Hebert v. Brown · Wilson III v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven if the protected conduct is a substantial element in the decision to terminate the employee, the employer will not be liable if the employee would have been discharged in the absence of the protected conduct.” As discussed below, this language appears to be referring to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall carry no presumption of renewal, and will terminate at the end of the stated term, if written notice of non-reappointment is given to the appointee.... 4 The appointment letters also advised that the appointee would be considered for a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Batra“could not create an expectation of entitlement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Batra
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.