Stanberry v. Sherman’s Empirical Analysis
75 F.3d 581 · 1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Maine v. Thiboutot · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Rosado v. Wyman · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. · Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in an action brought to enforce a provision of the Social Security Act ..., such provision is not to be deemed unenforceable because of its inclusion in a section of the Act requiring a State plan or specifying the required contents of a State plan. This section is not intended to limit or expand the grounds for determining the availability of prívate actions to enforce State plan requirements other than by overturning any such grounds applied in Suter v. Artist M but not applied in prior Supreme Court decisions respecting such enforceability; provided, however, that this section is not intended to alter the holding in Suter v. Artist M. that section 471(a)(15) of the Act [42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(l 5) ] is not enforceable in a private right of action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.