Poundstone v. Dew Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Ewolski v. City of Brunswick · Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) to mine and develop certain coal reserves in Henderson County, Kentucky in 1984. The following year, DEW subleased the property to Defendant Pyramid Coal Company. Plaintiffs subsequently sold their stock in DEW to Pyramid for $1.2 million, and entered into two separate agreements with Pyramid that called for Plaintiffs to receive certain contingent benefits for profits recognized from the property. These agreements were entitled the Contingent Benefit Agreement (or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“assume all of the duties and obligations of DEW and Pyramid under the [CBA and the CIA] from the date of this Agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) and the Contingent Interest Agreement (or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.