United States v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Bazzi · Hunter v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Davidson, so there is no misunderstanding, you have been entitled to be represented by a court-appointed attorney if the Court found that you couldn’t afford an attorney yourself. If you tell me you wish to be represented by an attorney, then we’ll simply vacate the Order that’s been entered and we’ll go back to square one without any prejudice to you. Do you wish to be represented by an attorney in this case?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.