Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 F. App'x 595

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-09-03

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2114

Relies on Anders v. California · Penson v. Ohio

Decided 2003-09-03

¶1MEMORANDUM …

¶2Numberous Leviticus Johnson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and forty-one month sentence for attempted robbery of a postal letter carrier, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a).

¶3*596Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Johnson has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Johnson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

¶4Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

¶5 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

/75/fappx/595 · .json · Public domain