Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 F. Supp. 672 - Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231

75 F. Supp. 672 - Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1991 · most notably National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board (1967), Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co. (1969)

57 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

370194819501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 163 (§ 13 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl · Carpenters and Joiners Union of America Local No 213 v. Ritter's Cafe · Douds v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This provision makes it unlawful to resort to a secondary boycott to injure the business of a third person who is wholly unconcerned in the disagreement between an employer and his employees.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the union was not extending its activity to a front remote from the immediate dispute but to one intimately and indeed inextricably united to it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cease doing business with any other person”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.