75 F. Supp. 2d 322 - Derdiger v. Tallman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
December 2008
most recently cited
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77R (§ 18 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No covered class action based upon the statutory or common law of any State or subdivision thereof may be maintained in any State or Federal court by any private party alleging - (1) an untrue statement or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security; or (2) that the defendant used or employed any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security. 'I* » ¥ s|: í¡í Any covered class action brought in any State court involving a covered security ... shall be removable to the Federal district court for the district in which the action is pending!.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.