State v. Deane’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1977
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 73 Cal. App. 2d 933 - People v. Carlson · State v. Hunter · State v. Scott · 22 Cal. App. 2d 392 - People v. Sberno · State v. Neil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant further contends the court erred in giving Instructions No. 17 and No. 18 on circumstantial evidence. He bases this contention upon the assertion there is no circumstantial evidence in the record. It is not necessary to, nor do we determine whether this is true. Appellant does not complain that the instructions given did not correctly state the law nor does he in anywise attempt to point out nor does the record show such instructions as given operate to his detriment or disadvantage. An instruction on circumstantial evidence in a case resting on direct testimony does not warrant reversal unless it is clearly made to appear that in some way appellant actually was prejudiced thereby.” 75 Idaho at page 153 , 268 P.2d at page 1116 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.