75 Md. 445
Decided March 15, 1892
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1892-03-15
The following opinion, containing a statement of the case, was delivered by Chief Judge Alvey, in the Court below: “This is an application by petition, filed in these consolidated cases, (Brown and others, Trustees vs. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co., and, others, and Sloan and others.
Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “In Cujus Rei Testimonium”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-03-15
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1995
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The questions involved in this case (have been so fully and so thoroughly considered and discussed in the opinion filed by Chief Judge Alvey in the Circuit Court for Washington County, that we need not restate them in this Court. As we entirely concur in the conclusions to which he came, we shall affirm the decree from which this appeal has been taken for the reasons which he has given.
¶2Decree affirmed, with costs in this Court, and in the Court below.