75 Md. App. 411 - Eades v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Jenkins v. State (2003), Cooley v. State (2005)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Irvin v. Dowd · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Smith v. Phillips · Remmer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““MRS. SKINNER: No, I did not. At one point I asked my husband [an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia] whether a statement — because you kept saying — why she could say-it was okay for her to say it, T knew I had been caught,’ and my husband said that was a spontaneous utterance. THE COURT: Okay. MS. SKINNER: — hearsay. MR. MONOHAN (Defense Counsel): I do not know if the Court wants me to ask the juror any questions. THE COURT: No. All right. Thank you, ma’am. Other than that one statement, nothing substantively about the facts or how the jury was standing? MS. SKINNER: No.” [Footnote omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jenkins v. State“Because the court in the case sub judice elicited juror Skinner’s statements during his interview of the individual jurors immediately following the return of their verdict, juror Skinner’s response to the court’s question did not run afoul of Lord Mansfield’s rule. It was therefore properly received and considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A private communication between a third party and a deliberating juror raises a serious concern that the juror may reach a verdict on the basis of the matters communicated, rather than the trial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.