Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 MICH 274 - Brown v. Buck

Brown v. Buck’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
9
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably In Re Simons (1918), Drury v. Franke (1933)

43 state decisions

10018891890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Boyce's Executors v. Felix Grundy · Russell v. Southard · Carpentier v. Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The system of chancery jurisprudence has been developed as carefully and as judiciously as any part of the legal system, and the judicial power includes it, and always must include it. Any change which transfers the power that belongs to a judge to a jury, or to any other person or body, is as plain a violation of the Constitution as one which should give the courts executive or legislative power vested elsewhere.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The right to have equity controversies dealt with by •equitable methods is as sacred as the right of trial by jury.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Apart from the serious question whether, under cover of amending one section of the Compiled Laws, the whole body of the laws can be revolutionized, it is very certain that laws passed for one purpose, and under one title or category, cannot be made to do duty under a foreign enactment, which was not in any way within their contemplated range.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.