Springhorn v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 1993
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 E.H. Smith 71 - Albany County Savings Bank v. McCarty · Hibberd v. Smith · Tyler v. Hall · Fain v. Smith · Security State Bank v. McIntyre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is required that the grantor shall unequivocally indicate it to be his intention that the instrument shall take effect as a conveyance of property in order to have it produce that result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roman v. Albert“A grant takes effect, so as to vest the interest intended to be transferred, only upon its delivery by the grantor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Hume's Estate
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.