Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 N.C. 239

State v. . Rose

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1876

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1876-06-05

PROCEEDING in Bastardy tried before Watts, J., at Spring Term, 1876, of Johnson Superior Court. The defendant was recognised to appear at Spring Term, 1876, When he moved the Court to quash the proceeding, and in support of the motion introduced evidence showing that at the time of the birth of the child the prosecutrix was a married woman. The Court allowed the motion and the State appealed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1949

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1876-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*240 Reade, J.

¶1 There is no error in the order appealed from. Where a child is born in wedlock, the law presumes it to be legitimate; and this presumption can only be removed by-proof of impossibility of access or impotency of the husband. This will be certified, that the proceedings may be quashed.

¶2 Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

/75/nc/239 · .json · Public domain