75 N.C. 393
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 15, 1876
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1876-06-15
This was a Civil Action, tried before his Honor Judge Cannon, at Fall Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of Haywood County, upon exceptions by plaintiff to the report of referees, to whom it had been referred to take certain accounts.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1906
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1876-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.
¶2*395Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Judgment below reversed. Case remanded to be proceeded in, &c. Let this opinion be certified. The plaintiff will recover costs in this court.
¶3Per CuriaM. Judgment reversed.