75 N.C. App. 99 - State v. Oakley’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2016
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · State v. Hill · State v. Shrader · United States v. Hecht · State v. Watkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On remand, the defendant may withdraw his guilty plea at the resentencing hearing, if the judge decides to impose a sentence other than the original plea arrangement, N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 15A-1024 (1983), or he may seek to negotiate new terms and conditions under his original plea to the lesser included offense. Reversed in part and remanded for reinstatement of guilty plea and resentencing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This crime occurred on September 24, 1983; the defendant, Terry Lynn Oakley, and the prosecuting witness and victim, Jackie Gathings, knew each other for some time. At this time, Mr. Oakley had been drinking and became mad or angry at the victim, accusing her of dating or going out with another man on him. He became violent and knocked her to the floor. The State’s evidence indicates that after she was knocked to the floor, he kicked her in the back. She required emergency treatment in the hospital and accumulated numerous bills for back injuries, including fracture to one of her vertebrae; there could be possible permanent damage; at this time it is unknown as to the extent of the damage; she has undergone an operation and total medical bills you have before you is over $10,000. She is still receiving treatment now, to my understanding. I believe you are aware of his prior record of felonious breaking and entering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oakley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.