Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 ND 657 - Cavalier County v. Gestson

Cavalier County v. Gestson’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 1966
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on The J. E. Rumbell · 19 Cal. 2d 605 - Neet v. Holmes · Clark v. Dennis · 101 N.J. Eq. 227 - Absecon Land Co. v. Keernes · Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The word `interest' is the broadest term applicable to claims in or upon real estate. In its ordinary signification among men of all classes it is broad enough to include any right, title, or estate in, or lien upon, real estate. One who holds a mortgage upon a piece of land for half its value is commonly and truthfully said to be interested, to have an interest, in it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Actions for the recovery of real property, or of an estate therein, or for the determination of such right or interest, or for the partition of real property, must be brought in the county in which the subject of the action or some part thereof is situated."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`It is significant that the coverage of the statutes includes a mere "interest”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.